"If the average college student spends approximately $1000 per year on textbooks and yet performs scholastically no better than the student who utilizes free OER, what exactly is being purchased with that $1000?" (Hilton, 2016)
“The disproportionately negative effect of course material costs on historically underserved students reemphasizes textbook affordability as a redistributive social justice issue" (Jenkins et al., 2020).
Food insecure students were more heavily impacted by unaffordable course materials:
The study results (shown below) demonstrated that textbook costs were a substantial barrier for the vast majority of students, but that these barriers were even more significant among historically underserved students, confirming "textbook affordability as a redistributive justice issue, and positing OER as a potential avenue for realizing a more socially just college experience" (Jenkins et al., 2020).
Sources:
Crossfield, M., & Ryan, D. (2022, October). White paper: Improving student success through the use of Open Educational Resources. Yavapai College, licensed under CC BY 4.0
Hilton, J., Mason, S., & Clinton-Lisell, V. (n.d.). The review project. Open Education Group, licensed under CC BY 4.0
Jenkins, J. J., Sánchez, L. A., Schraedley, M. A. K., Hannans, J., Navick, N. & Young, J. (2020). Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue.
Nagle, C., & Vitez, K. (2021, February). Fixing the Broken Textbook Market: Third Edition.Links to an external site. U.S. PIRG Education Fund, licensed under CC BY 4.0
Textbook costs text adapted from "Open Education" by SPARC, licensed under CC BY 4.0
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, August 30). College tuition and fees increase 63 percent since January 2006.
Los Angeles Mission College. All rights reserved. - 13356 Eldridge Avenue, Sylmar, CA 91342. 818-364-7600 | LACCD.edu | ADA Compliance
Questions or comments about this web site? Please leave Feedback